United States v. Tenzer, 950 F. Supp. 554 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) case opinion from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York 950 F. Supp. 554 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James L. TENZER, Defendant. No. 95 Cr. 1016(CLB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 10, 1996. *555 Mary Jo White, United States Attorney,...
READ MORE United States v. Tenzer, 950 F. Supp. 554 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
The Court deemed the covenants facially invalid, and further determined that they violated public policy by attempting to “hoard” employees and use the covenants for “monopolistic” purposes. In reaching these decisions, the Court shed a good deal of light on (1) the evolving procedural and evidentiary requirements for an early determination of enforceability in Virginia; (2) the current permissible scope...
We invite you to view Employment Law This Week® – a weekly rundown of the latest news in the field, brought to you by Epstein Becker Green. We look at the latest trends, important court decisions, and new developments that could impact your work. Join us every Monday for a new five-minute episode! Read the firm’s press release here and...
We invite you to view Employment Law This Week®[1] – a weekly rundown of the latest news in the field, brought to you by Epstein Becker Green. We look at the latest trends, important court decisions, and new developments that could impact your work. Join us every Monday for a new five-minute episode! Read the firm’s press release here[2] and...
